Drink More Expensive Beer


Unibroue Chambly NoireA few weeks back I had a reason to celebrate. A long time friend came to visit us at our home for a few days. When he arrived I (naturally) wanted to mark the occasion by opening up a bottle of something for us to drink and to share. Now, for me, it’s natural to think “what beers do I have in the cellar that would be good for the occasion?” However, I suspect that most people might automatically dismiss beer and mentally run through the catalog of wines and champagnes they have on hand. The reason I suspect this is that we naturally want to mark joyous and important occasions not with economy, but with extravagance. Not that we wish to impress (though vanity is, no doubt part of it), but when an old friend arrives after a long trip we want to open our finest bottle of something. And as quality and price (supposedly) scale in proportion, wine or champagne or a bottle of scotch whiskey win out over beer.

All About Beer March 2006 CoverWhile on a little beer research excursion into Manhattan I took along the March issue of All About Beer with me to read on the train. In that issue there is a reprint of an article by (the beer and whiskey world’s ) Michael Jackson from 2000 about how the beer industry hasn’t managed to convince consumers that beer is a sophisticated choice in beverages. Since a beer magazine is reprinting this article six years later, I’m assuming not much has changed since Jackson originally wrote it. Among other things, Jackson’s article identifies two factors that have contributed to keeping beer in third place (behind wine and spirits) as a consumer choice: price and consumer education.

Beer is inexpensive when compared with wine or spirits. The most expensive beers you’ll be able to find are in the twenty dollar range. While this might seem like a good thing to the individual beer consumer, the low price of beer makes it less lucrative for producers and so there are fewer producers. My counterintuitive argument is that if craft brewers charged a minimum of twenty dollars per 750 ml bottle, they would be more successful.

Here on Long Island, there are something like thirty-five wineries—thirty-five! (plus or minus). How many brewpubs and breweries are there? Four brewpubs and one brewery. What’s up with that? If anything, those numbers should be reversed. But beer culture in the US has a long way to go before it can get to where wine culture already is. The two-fold path of elevating beer culture is, as Michael Jackson said, price and consumer education.

Beer producers must be willing to make smaller quantities of more expensive beer. And in order for them to be successful beer consumers (or perhaps a whole new beer consumer) must be told why they should be drinking expensive beer (at least some of the time). My dream is to drive through the old farmlands of Long Island from microbrewery to microbrewery sampling bottles of expensive beer. So keep reading Brewsday, I’ll tell you why you should buy and drink expensive beer.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Kentucky Bourbon
Mint Julep
BlogHer Ad Network
More from BlogHer
Advertise here
BlogHer Privacy Policy

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

I’m a supporter of the notion that generally we don’t pay enough for better beer - having, in fact, written about it in All About Beer Magazine (which you pictured).

But not all great beer has to cost more. For instance, and since you mention Long Island, there are good reasons that Phil Markowski’s Cuvee de Fleurs costs more than his Secret Ale.

Understanding why should be part of the education process you are talking about.

Mr Hieronymus– Thanks for your comment. I agree completely with your suggestion and I hope that I’ll succeed in explaining the value of quality beer to the readers of The Spirit World.

Both Secret Ale and Cuvee de Fleurs are excellent beers. I opened a bottle of Cuvee de Fleurs to have with Christmas dinner last year. Indeed it did mark the occasion.

I hope that readers of The Spirit World will visit Appellation Beer (http://www.appellationbeer.com/) and read the excellent articles there.

One more thing, your book, Brew Like a Monk, is excellent. I also have Phil Markowski’s Farmhouse Ales and Jeff Sparrow’s Wild Brews all of which I plan to review for the readers of The Spirit World.

Thanks Donavan, you made me blush at least twice.

You have access to some great beers in Long Island, from the region and afar, so I’m looking forward to seeing what you pick.

And perhaps commenting on them ;>)

I think that possibly another reason for the lack of “classy” consumption of beer is that a bottle of $20 wine will provide 4-5 servings, while a bottle of beer will only provide 1-2 servings.

Also, beer tends to be very filling, which could detract from serving it with or before a meal?

Craig- I suppose it really depends on how much fluid is in a “serving.” The $20 bottle of beer I’m referring to is 750 ml (or nearly 26 oz), the same size as your typical bottle of wine. If we define a “serving” as 150 ml (just a little over 5 oz), we’ll get 5 “servings” out of each bottle. Is 5 oz of beer not enough? You want to drink more than 5 oz of beer? That’s great. I think that might prove some point.

As for beer being filling, I’ve heard people say that. For many years I have considered beer an ideal aperitif. In fact I try to do my serious tasting and making of tasting notes before dinner; one of the reasons for this is it stimulates the appetite. I preferentially pair beer with food, as I find beer more versatile than wine and have never noticed that the beer was filling me up.

I know the filling sensation is probably subjective and differs from person to person, but I suspect that the roots of this common impression is that people generally drink larger quantities of beer when they drink it.